There are currently 0 users and 215 guests online.
Books reviewed in this issue (available from Amazon.com)
The ISI Journal Citation Reports that Systematic Biology had an impact factor of 10.257 for the year 2004, up from 7.740 in 2003. I think this reflects very well on the work my predecessor Chris Simon and her Associate Editors put in to the journal. In the Evolutionary Biology category, Systematic Biology is second only to the review journal TREE. Hence, we have the largest impact factor of any research journal in evolutionary biology.
The Tree Thinking Group is a loose association of people , including researchers, teachers and students, who are interested in teaching and learning evolutionary biology effectively. There are, of course, many groups that are interested in improving evolution education and you can find out about some of them on our resource pages. What makes this effort stand out somewhat is our focus on tree thinking Ã¢â?¬" that is, the use of a phylogenetic perspective for making sense of biology.
Visit the web site at www.tree-thinking.org.
The 52nd Annual Systematics Symposium "Reconstructing Complex Evolutionary Histories: Gene-Species Trees, Historical Biogeography, and Coevolutions" will be held from 7-9 October 2005 at the Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Registration forms are available from our web site. For more information, please contact the Symposium Organizer: Mick Richardson, Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166-0299, U.S.A. Tel.: +1 (314) 577 5176, Fax: +1 (314) 577 0820, e-mail email@example.com.
Phylogenetic supertrees:Combining information to reveal the Tree of Life
This is the first book on "phylogenetic supertrees", a recent, but controversial development for inferring evolutionary trees. Rather than analyze the combined primary character data directly, supertree construction proceeds by combining the tree topologies derived from those data. This difference in strategy has allowed for the exciting possibility of larger, more complete phylogenies than are otherwise currently possible, with the potential to revolutionize evolutionarily-based research.
The authors conclude:
Our phylogenetic analyses do not support tree-thinking. These results have important conceptual and practical implications. We argue that representations other than a tree should be investigated in this case because a non-critical concatenation of markers could be highly misleading.
This Prize is the only award in the world for excellence in biodiversity informatics, the area of science that develops computer programs and uses the Internet in support of research on the range and spread of life on earth.
Read more on the GBIF site.
The PhyCom server has been hacked, so the site will be down for a few days. There are some sad people in this world who have nothing better to do than create needless work for others.
StÃ?Â©phane Guindon and Olivier Gascuel's paper
According to the ISI, a fast breaking paper is a paper in the top 1% of the most cited papers in a field which has had the largest percentage increase in citations from one bimonthly update to the next.
The Genealogical World of Phylogenetic Networks
BMC Evolutionary Biology